Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

DT-003: The Pharisee Function — Knowledge Decay as Structural Inevitability

Authors: Lowe, David;

DT-003: The Pharisee Function — Knowledge Decay as Structural Inevitability

Abstract

Paper I of the Principia Moralia Theophysics Doctoral Series (DT-003). This paper formalizes the Pharisee Decay Function — a 9-step cycle describing how knowledge systems built to serve truth progressively displace it. The pattern is shown to be structurally inevitable rather than contingent on individual failure, operating identically across religious, academic, medical, legal, and technological institutions. The decay is formalized through the Knowledge-Wisdom Transform: W = T^a K^(1-a) H(F - Fc) * F(S,t). When a > 1, knowledge accumulation without truth-alignment produces diminishing and eventually negative returns on wisdom. The Heaviside gate function H(F - Fc) encodes Proverbs 9:10 as a binary phase transition: epistemic humility is a gate condition, not a gradient. Empirical grounding is provided through three peer-reviewed cognitive mechanisms: the Bias Blind Spot (Pronin et al., 2002), Naive Realism (Ross & Ward, 1995), and the Introspection Illusion (Pronin, 2007). Cross-domain mapping is applied across 45 institutional domains. The paper includes full bias declaration (Biaxiosum), four explicit kill conditions, and self-identifies its own framework as structurally vulnerable to the same decay. Derived with Claude Opus 4.6. Author: independent researcher, self-funded, Christian theist, no institutional affiliation.

Keywords

cognitive bias, philosophy of science, theology, institutional decay, epistemology, entropy, knowledge decay

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!