Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Metacapnodium stanhughesii Berbee & Aliabadi 2026, sp. nov.

Authors: Aliabadi, Faezeh; Le Renard, Ludovic; Berbee, Mary L.;

Metacapnodium stanhughesii Berbee & Aliabadi 2026, sp. nov.

Abstract

Metacapnodium stanhughesii Berbee & Aliabadi sp. nov. Fig. 15 Typification. Canada • British Columbia Province, Vancouver, The University of British Columbia, 2075–2099 Main Mall, 49.26504°N, 123.25290°W, on bark of Taxus sp., 2 July 2021, F. Aliabadi & L. Le Renard (holotype: UBC F 35817). Etymology. Named in honor of mycologist Stanley J. Hughes. GenBank accession numbers. ITS, OR 532926; LSU, PP 140681; ef 1 - α, OR 820949. Description. Subicula dark brown to black, velutinous, thin, up to 2–4 mm thick, covering the bark of a trunk of Taxus sp. and intermingled with other sooty molds. Mycelium of moniliform hyphae, hyphae brown to dark brown, constricted at septa, surfaces finely verrucose throughout, cell wall thickness of 0.5–1 μm. Hyphae curved, straight, occasionally anastomosing, narrowing towards their tips. Cells usually broader than long, subglobose to doliiform, 13–21 × 10–16 μm, narrowing to 5–7 μm at hyphal tips. Sexual form unknown. Asexual forms. Capnobotrys – Differentiated conidiophores not observed. Conidiogenous cells in botryose clusters laterally or terminally on hyphal tips or at ends of short, 1–2 celled lateral branches, spherical, subspherical, ellipsoid, 3–10 × 3–9 μm, light brown to dark brown, bearing denticulate scars where successive conidia budded out, then seceded. Conidia brown to dark brown, smooth walled, initially subglobose, then ellipsoid or ovoid, occasionally cornute or allantoid, with a single median or supramedial septum, not or only slightly constricted at septa. Conidia (10) – 12.7 – (15) + / – 1.3 × (6) – 7.7 – (9) + / – 0.9 µm, N = 30, Q = 1.7. Proximal cells longer and wider than distal cells; proximal cell 7.0 + / - 0.9 × 7.7 + / - 0.8 µm; distal cell 5.7 + / - 0.9 × 7.0 + / - 0.7 µm. Proximal cell: distal cell length ratio, 1.3, width ratio 1.2. Proximal cells sometimes with inconspicuous oblique scar resulting from secession from diagonal attachment to a conidiogenous cell; apex of distal cells shows wall thinning, light in color, which sometimes protrudes slightly. Capnophialophora – Phialides scanty, occasionally at hyphal tips, with a verruculose, brown, subspherical venter, 4–5 × 5 μm, bearing a funnel-shaped, pale brown collarette 2–3 μm long, with a narrow constriction at its base, 2.5–3 μm wide at its opening. No phialidic conidia observed. Capnosporium – Branched, erect hyphae bear individual conidia at or near their tip cells. Capnosporium conidia ellipsoid, obclavate, mainly straight, occasionally curved, 2–6 septate, sessile, 19–21 × 8–10 μm (2 – septate), 27–34 × 8–12 μm (3 – septate), 33–42 (– 47) × 11–12 μm (4 – septate) μm. Host and distribution. Known only from a single collection on Taxus sp. in shaded, landscaped area next to Chemistry Building on University of British Columbia campus. The subiculum, first noticed by Ludovic Le Renard, changed little over five years. Notes. Among the described Metacapnodium species, M. moniliforme is similar to M. stanhughesii in morphology. Phylogenetically, M. stanhughesii cannot be included in M. moniliforme because the ITS tree and the concatenated region tree show M. stanhughesii as branching outside of a clade consisting of M. neesii and M. moniliforme. Metacapnodium guava is also similar to M. stanhughesii in that it shares capnophialophora, capnobotrys, and capnosporium forms (Hughes, 1981). While the dimensions of conidia in M. stanhughesii fall between those of M. moniliforme and M. guava, M. stanhughesii (Fig. 15 E) and M. moniliforme (Fig. 10 I) exhibit cornute conidia with a slight point at one end, which were not seen in M. guava (Hughes, 1981). Cornute and allantoid conidial morphology arise in Capnobotrys lechlerianus (Hughes and Seifert 2012), but the hyphal walls of Capnobotrys lechlerianus are smooth rather than verrucose as in M. stanhughesii and M. moniliforme. Hughes and Seifert (2012) used the absence of capnophialophora and capnosporium forms, and the smaller dimensions of conidia to distinguish Capnobotrys lechlerianus from the capnobotrys form of M. moniliforme (Hughes and Seifert 2012).

Published as part of Aliabadi, Faezeh, Le Renard, Ludovic & Berbee, Mary L., 2026, Taxonomy and phylogeny of the epiphytic sooty molds in family Metacapnodiaceae (class Eurotiomycetes, subclass Chaetothyriomycetidae), pp. 163-212 in MycoKeys 129 on pages 163-212, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.129.178067

Keywords

Ascomycota, Dothideomycetes, Fungi, Metacapnodium, Metacapnodium stanhughesii, Biodiversity, Capnodiales, Metacapnodiaceae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!