Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Governance Era in Health Technology Management.

Authors: Abouyahia, Othmane;

The Governance Era in Health Technology Management.

Abstract

This white paper explores the structural challenges associated with Health Technology Management (HTM) in modern healthcare systems and highlights the growing need for governance-oriented approaches to medical equipment management. Healthcare institutions invest billions in medical technologies, yet governance frameworks for managing these assets often remain underdeveloped. As a result, hospitals face hidden financial exposure, operational inefficiencies, and increasing lifecycle risks associated with aging equipment portfolios. This publication introduces a governance-based perspective on HTM and proposes a structured analytical framework to assess institutional maturity in managing medical technologies. The paper presents the ATLAS HTM Index, a conceptual model designed to evaluate governance maturity across multiple operational and financial dimensions. Through analytical modeling and benchmark-based estimates, the report illustrates how insufficient governance structures may lead to significant financial exposure for healthcare institutions. The study also examines systemic risk dynamics related to lifecycle management, preventive maintenance discipline, vendor governance, and capital planning. The publication aligns with international HTM standards and guidelines, including those developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), AAMI, and ISO, and aims to contribute to the broader discussion on strengthening governance frameworks for medical technology systems. The report is intended for healthcare executives, biomedical engineering leaders, policymakers, and healthcare system stakeholders seeking to improve the strategic governance of medical technology assets. Contact and collaboration Institutions, healthcare organizations, researchers, and policymakers interested in discussing the findings of this report or exploring collaborative initiatives in Health Technology Management governance are invited to contact the author. Professional inquiries and discussions are welcome via: •⁠ ⁠LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/othmane-abouyahia•⁠ ⁠Email: oabouyahia@atlasmedequipment.com•⁠ ⁠Website: https://www.atlasmedequipment.com

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average