
Genetically modified (GM) crops have been a subject of extensive debate in Africa, with varying perspectives and policies across different countries. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, including peer-reviewed articles, government documents, and interviews with agricultural experts, to analyse the perceptions and policies related to GM crops in Somalia. The analysis revealed a significant proportion (60%) of stakeholders favoring the adoption of GM crops for addressing food security challenges, while highlighting concerns over environmental impacts. The regulatory framework is currently underdeveloped, with only limited guidelines available. Despite the mixed views on GM crops among stakeholders, there is an urgent need to develop a robust regulatory system and engage in public dialogues to facilitate informed decision-making regarding their adoption. Developing a transparent and inclusive regulatory framework should be prioritised. Engaging with various stakeholder groups through multi-stakeholder platforms can help address concerns and promote understanding of the benefits and risks associated with GM crops. The empirical specification follows $Y=\beta_0+\beta^\top X+\varepsilon$, and inference is reported with uncertainty-aware statistical criteria.
empirical study, comparative analysis, sustainable development, stakeholder perspectives, Genetic modification, agriculture policy, thematic synthesis
empirical study, comparative analysis, sustainable development, stakeholder perspectives, Genetic modification, agriculture policy, thematic synthesis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
