Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Latency comparison between baseline execution and TEE enclave execution of a multi-model consistency checker

Authors: Bergemann, Sebastian;

Latency comparison between baseline execution and TEE enclave execution of a multi-model consistency checker

Abstract

This dataset contains the raw latency measurements used in the evaluation of a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)-based multi-model consistency checker, as presented in the accompanying research paper. The dataset was collected to quantify the runtime overhead introduced by executing a cross-organizational consistency checker inside an Intel SGX enclave compared to native execution. The measurements were obtained by repeatedly executing consistency checking scenarios under two configurations: (1) baseline execution without a TEE and (2) execution inside an SGX enclave using the Occlum LibOS. The scenarios vary in the number of checked model elements, the number of data requests issued by the checker, and the number of performed rule evaluations. Both single-element checks and recursive checks over larger model structures were evaluated. The dataset contains timestamp-derived latency measurements for each individual run, along with metadata describing the corresponding scenario, including trigger component, check type (single or recursive), presence of simulated inconsistencies, number of checked elements, number of data requests, and number of rule evaluations. Each scenario was executed at least 100 times to account for runtime variability in a cloud-based environment. In total, the dataset comprises 2,800 individual latency measurements across all evaluated scenarios and configurations.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average