This study examines a documented architectural framework for digital governance originally formalized in 2004 through notarized documentation and subsequently communicated to institutional authorities. The research reconstructs the structural and functional characteristics of this early architecture and evaluates its correspondence with digital governance systems that later emerged within institutional environments. Using enterprise architecture terminology and structured comparative modeling, the study analyzes the original 2004 framework and compares it with institutional digital governance implementations that appeared after 2006. The analysis focuses on architectural layers, system coordination principles, and algorithmic logic structures. The findings indicate a substantial level of architectural and functional equivalence between the early documented framework and later institutional governance systems. This work contributes to the chronological understanding of digital governance architectures and proposes a methodological approach for evaluating prior architectural documentation in relation to subsequent institutional implementations.

Version 3 – Minor revision.Improved architectural figure (Figure 1), corrected typographic issues, and applied minor formatting adjustments. No changes were made to the analytical methodology, findings, or conclusions.