Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Exploring the Mediating Role of Perceived Authenticity Between Haptic Feedback and Consumer Trust

Authors: Aneesh J R;

Exploring the Mediating Role of Perceived Authenticity Between Haptic Feedback and Consumer Trust

Abstract

As digital shopping becomes increasingly immersive through technologies such as augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and high-fidelity interactive platforms, consumers can see and explore products in unprecedented ways. However, one critical sensory element remains limited in online environments—touch. The inability to physically feel products often creates hesitation and reduces trust. This study explores how integrating haptic feedback into high-fidelity digital shopping environments influences consumer trust. Drawing from Cue Utilisation Theory and Media Richness Theory, the research examines whether tactile simulations enhance perceived product authenticity, reduce uncertainty, and strengthen overall platform credibility. Data collected from consumers interacting with digitally simulated shopping interfaces were analysed using reliability and correlation techniques. The findings suggest that when consumers experience tactile cues, products feel more realistic, risk perceptions decline, and confidence in purchase decisions increases. The impact is particularly strong for touch-sensitive product categories. By highlighting the emotional and cognitive role of simulated touch, this study emphasises that trust in digital commerce is not built through visuals alone—it is shaped by multisensory engagement. Keywords: Haptic Feedback; Consumer Trust; High-Fidelity Digital Shopping

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!