
Scientific credibility depends not only on the logical structure of theories, but on the temporal architecture through which predictions become empirically visible.This conceptual essay introduces the notion of feedback time as a structural variable shaping the social credibility of scientific theories. It examines how the temporal structure of verification cycles influences the boundary between science, pseudoscience, and technological authority, particularly in the context of emerging artificial intelligence.
scientific credibility, science institutions, AGI epistemology, philosophy of science, pseudoscience, artificial general intelligence, scientific trust, epistemic opacity, feedback time
scientific credibility, science institutions, AGI epistemology, philosophy of science, pseudoscience, artificial general intelligence, scientific trust, epistemic opacity, feedback time
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
