Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

AICOS®: Decision Authority Infrastructure for Artificial Intelligence Governance

Authors: kalafatoglu, yasin;

AICOS®: Decision Authority Infrastructure for Artificial Intelligence Governance

Abstract

This paper introduces AICOS® (Artificial Intelligence Control and Oversight System), a governance-first technological architecture designed to manage decision authority in artificial intelligence systems. While modern artificial intelligence research has focused primarily on model capability, computational performance, and data scale, the governance of AI-assisted decision processes remains an unresolved structural challenge. As AI systems become embedded in critical infrastructures such as finance, healthcare, energy systems, and public governance, the need for accountable decision mechanisms becomes increasingly important. This research proposes the concept of Decision Authority Infrastructure as a new architectural layer within artificial intelligence systems. The proposed infrastructure operates between AI models and real-world execution environments and ensures that AI-generated outputs are validated through governance constraints before influencing operational decisions. The AICOS® architecture integrates several governance mechanisms, including uncertainty thresholds, decision risk evaluation, irreversibility analysis, deterministic decision replay, and human-final authority enforcement. These mechanisms enable transparent, auditable, and institutionally aligned decision processes. Mathematically, the decision pipeline is defined as a structured transformation from data inputs to final actions under governance constraints. The framework models decision authority as a constrained optimization process and introduces formal representations for decision uncertainty, decision risk, and irreversible outcomes. The paper argues that the next phase of global artificial intelligence deployment will require governance-native infrastructure capable of ensuring safe, accountable, and traceable AI-assisted decisions. Decision Authority Infrastructure represents a foundational step toward integrating institutional authority structures directly into artificial intelligence systems. The AICOS® framework contributes a new perspective to AI governance research by proposing a technological infrastructure that bridges artificial intelligence capabilities with institutional decision authority. This work aims to stimulate further research on governance-native AI architectures and decision accountability mechanisms in advanced artificial intelligence systems.

This work proposes a governance-oriented infrastructure for artificial intelligence systems and focuses on the structural challenge of decision authority in AI-assisted environments. The AICOS® framework is designed as a technological architecture that operates between AI model outputs and real-world execution systems. Its purpose is not to replace artificial intelligence models but to introduce an institutional governance layer capable of validating decisions generated by AI systems. The proposed architecture integrates formal governance mechanisms such as uncertainty management, decision risk evaluation, irreversibility analysis, deterministic decision replay, and human-final authority principles. These mechanisms allow decisions to be evaluated according to predefined governance policies before operational implementation. The study contributes a conceptual and mathematical framework describing how decision authority can be represented within artificial intelligence infrastructures. The model defines decision pipelines as transformations from input data to final actions under governance constraints and introduces risk and uncertainty parameters for structured decision escalation. This work aims to stimulate research on governance-native artificial intelligence architectures and to encourage the development of technological infrastructures capable of supporting responsible AI deployment in critical systems. The research does not propose autonomous AI decision-making. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of maintaining human authority over high-impact decisions while allowing AI systems to provide analytical support within structured governance environments.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence AI Governance Decision Authority Decision Infrastructure Algorithmic Governance Responsible AI AI Risk Management Decision Systems Human-in-the-Loop AI AI Safety AI Accountability AI Governance Architecture Decision Intelligence AI Policy Infrastructure AI Decision Governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!