Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Ectomycorrhiza in Flemish forest soils: an exploratory DNA analysis of soil fungal communities near young and mature trees

Authors: Valvekens, Lieze; Debode, Jane; Roelandt, Eline; Buysse, Wim; Haegeman, Annelies;

Ectomycorrhiza in Flemish forest soils: an exploratory DNA analysis of soil fungal communities near young and mature trees

Abstract

1. Fungal / ectomycorrhizal microbiome in forest soils near clumps of young trees Forest soils are rich in fungi, including ectomycorrhizae that form mutualistic relationships with trees. In recent years, more young trees planted in Belgian forests have struggled to survive. To understand these shifting dynamics, soil samples were taken around these trees before planting and at five time points afterwards, over a period of ca. 4 years. Four tree species growing in different forests were studied: Quercus robur, Quercus petraea, Tilia cordata and Pinus sylvestris. Prior to planting, trees received one of four options: two treatments aimed at improving survival and vitality (myco and gel+myco) or two controls (gel and no treatment). The myco treatments consisted of a preparation presumed to contain ectomycorrhiza. Gel was intended to improve contact between ectomycorrhiza and tree roots when combined with myco, but was also tested without myco as a control, since the gel can influence water retention. The roots of the plantlets were dipped in the gel solution prior to planting in case of the treatments including gel; while for the myco treatment, the myco solution was mixed with the planting soil. These treatment solutions, as well as the soil in which the trees were planted, were sampled before application to assess their fungal communities using DNA metabarcoding targeting ITS2. After four years, survival rate, height, and annual shoot length of the young trees were measured. For comparison, soil around mature trees was also sampled at different timepoints and analysed with metabarcoding. Our findings suggest that treatments only benefited Pinus sylvestris, which could be related not to tree species but to forest age, which was relatively young in this case. Moreover, there seems to be no superior treatment: even the gel control without myco resulted in higher survival and vitality. There are probably multiple explanations for this observation. The gel may have influenced the water availability around the roots, which could explain why all treatments had a positive effect compared to the control (no treatment). According to the metabarcoding data, the myco preparations contained little or no ectomycorrhiza, hence we can hypothesize that this was the reason that their added value was minute. Higher ectomycorrhizal abundance in soil coincided with greater survival and vitality for Pinus sylvestris. The other tree species planted in older forests did not benefit from treatments or higher ectomycorrhizal abundance, possibly a consequence of our observation that ectomycorrhiza were relatively more abundant before planting than in the young forest. In addition to the experimental setup with young plantlets, soil surrounding mature trees was sampled to explore the ectomycorrhizal community structure. In general, the relative amount of ectomycorrhizae in the fungal community was much larger in soils of older forests versus younger forests. Soils surrounding mature trees had approximately the same relative abundance of ectomycorrhiza as soils near young trees in older forests, which was on average 4 times higher than in the soil near the young trees in the young forest. Furthermore, ectomycorrhizal percentages varied over time, even around the same tree, due to the heterogeneous distribution of soil fungi and environmental circumstances (different seasons). 2. Fungal microbiome in forest soils near Pinus trees Native pine trees in Belgium (Pinus sylvestris) are increasingly affected by climate change because of their lack of heat and drought tolerance. For this reason, in forest renewal, the species Pinus nigra subsp. laricio is chosen more often nowadays since this species can better cope with heat and drought stress. Stressed trees are more susceptible to disease. Both pine tree species can suffer from Diplodia tip blight (Sphaeropsis sapinea), which has already led to significant losses. Emerging new pathogens such as Dothistroma needle blight (Dothistroma septospora) increase the challenges for healthy pine forests. Ectomycorrhizal fungi are believed to offer some protection against the disease. Therefore, we investigated the soil fungal community surrounding the two aforementioned pine species. Our aim was to determine whether differences in fungal and ectomycorrhizal community composition exist between the two species and whether tree health correlates with ectomycorrhizal presence. While the overall fungal community differed between species, ectomycorrhizal communities were more similar. No significant difference was found in the percentage of ectomycorrhiza relative to all fungi between the two species. Likewise, there was no difference in the relative abundance of ectomycorrhiza between healthy and diseased trees for either species. However, for Pinus nigra subsp. laricio, trees that were recovering from disease showed a higher relative abundance of ectomycorrhiza. These results should however be interpreted cautiously due to the limited sample size and the confounding effect of location. Nevertheless, further research on the relationship between pine health and ectomycorrhizal presence would be valuable.

Keywords

Ectomycorrhiza, Forest soil, Fungi, Metabarcoding

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average