Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Performance Analysis of LECTOR-Based CMOS Input-Inverter MUX

Authors: Mustasheen, Mahi; Rabeya, Bushra; Samiha, Tabassum;

Performance Analysis of LECTOR-Based CMOS Input-Inverter MUX

Abstract

Power dissipation has become a critical design concern in modern VLSI systems due to aggressive device scaling and the resulting increase in leakage currents. The CMOS input-inverter multiplexer (MUX) is widely employed as a fundamental building block in configurable and control-oriented digital circuits. However, its continuous operation leads to considerable static power consumption, particularly in deep-submicron technologies. This paper presents the analysis of a power-efficient CMOS input-inverter MUX incorporating the Leakage Control Transistor (LECTOR) technique. In the proposed architecture, LECTOR transistors are integrated into the inverter stage of the CMOS input-inverter MUX to effectively suppress subthreshold leakage currents during both idle and switching conditions. Key performance parameters, including transient response, slew rate, and power dissipation, are evaluated and compared with those of a conventional CMOS input-inverter MUX. Simulation results demonstrate a significant reduction in power dissipation, achieving operation in the sub-microwatt range while maintaining stable transient characteristics. Although a moderate degradation in slew rate is observed due to the inclusion of additional leakage control transistors, the overall performance trade-off remains acceptable for low-power and energy-constrained applications. Consequently, the proposed CMOS input-inverter MUX with LECTOR technique is well suited for low-power programmable logic and configuration circuits in modern VLSI systems.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!