
A persistent objection to discrete spacetime models is the apparent incompatibil- ity between lattice regularity and Lorentz invariance. Previous approaches attempt to recover Lorentz symmetry approximately through statistical averaging, achiev- ing suppression factors that are astronomically small but never identically zero [3]. We demonstrate that this approach fundamentally misidentifies the problem. In the Selection-Stitch Model (SSM) [4], the 3D FCC bulk lattice is not a foundational background—it is an emergent holographic projection of a 2D boundary network. In this paper, we explicitly verify that the SSM’s Stitch-Lift construction satisfies the exact Ryu-Takayanagi (RT) relation [6]. By defining the Stitch operator as a maxi- mally entangled Bell pair projector [4], we derive the exact boundary entanglement entropy SA = ncut ln 2. We then construct the emergent minimal bulk surface γA and geometrically derive Newton’s constant as GN = 2/3L2/(4 ln 2) [8]. Having established the exactness of this holographic map, we prove that: (1) The fundamen- tal 2D hexagonal boundary possesses exact continuous rotational symmetry SO(2). (2) The holographic map preserves this continuous symmetry exactly. (3) The emer- gent 3D bulk inherits exact SO(3) spatial isotropy [5]. (4) In 3+1 dimensions, exact SO(3) uniquely implies SO(3,1) Poincar´e invariance for dimension-4 operators. Ul- timately, the apparent discreteness of the 3D lattice is merely an artifact of the bulk coordinate description. This definitively closes the principal foundational gap in the SSM.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
