Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Duct-level evaluation of mammary gland health, somatic cell count and bacterial flora in lactating jennies

Authors: Attili, Anna Rita; Gallina, Elisa Tsaheylu; Storoni, Chiara; MASSACCI, FRANCESCA ROMANA; Bazzano, Marilena; duranti, anna; Li, Yubao; +1 Authors

Duct-level evaluation of mammary gland health, somatic cell count and bacterial flora in lactating jennies

Abstract

Dataset Title Dataset: Duct-level evaluation of mammary gland health, somatic cell count and bacterial flora in lactating jennies ⸻ Authors Attili A.R., Gallina E.T., Storoni C., Massacci F.; Bazzano M., Duranti A.; Li Y.; Cuteri V. Corresponding author: Prof. Vincenzo Cuteri School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine University of Camerino, Italy vincenzo.cuteri@unicam.it ⸻ Dataset Description This dataset contains duct-level milk analysis results from a cross-sectional observational study conducted on 29 clinically healthy lactating jennies from six farms located in Central Italy (Umbria and Lazio regions). Each jenny was sampled at the individual duct level. Milk was collected separately from: • Right Lateral Duct (RLD) • Right Medial Duct (RMD) • Left Lateral Duct (LLD) • Left Medial Duct (LMD) A total of 116 duct-level samples were analysed. The study aimed to evaluate mammary gland health by integrating: • Somatic cell count (SCC) • Bacteriological culture with MALDI-TOF identification • Total bacterial count (TBC) • Selected host-related variables Study Design Non-randomised observational cross-sectional study. Milk sampling was performed under routine farm management conditions. No experimental treatments were administered. ⸻ Variables Included in the Dataset Animal-Level Variables • Animal_ID Anonymised identification code for each jenny. • Farm_ID Anonymised farm code. • AgeCat Age category (as defined in manuscript). • ParityCat Parity category. • LactStage Lactation stage: • 1 = 0–3 months • 2 = 4–6 months • 3 = 7–9 months • Aptitude Production aptitude (milk production or companion). ⸻ Duct-Level Variables • Duct Sampling site: • RLD = Right Lateral Duct • RMD = Right Medial Duct • LLD = Left Lateral Duct • LMD = Left Medial Duct • SCC Somatic cell count expressed as cells/mL. Determined using the direct microscopic method (Breed and Prescott). • SCC_cat_200k Exploratory categorical variable: • 0 = <200,000 cells/mL • 1 = ≥200,000 cells/mL (Note: no validated SCC cut-off exists for donkeys; this threshold was used for exploratory purposes only.) • TBC Total bacterial count expressed as colony-forming units per mL (CFU/mL). • Bact_Pos Bacteriological culture result: • 0 = No bacterial growth • 1 = Positive culture • Bacterial_Isolate Bacterial species identified by MALDI-TOF MS (when applicable). ⸻ Laboratory Methods Summary Somatic Cell Count (SCC) • Direct microscopic method (Breed and Prescott) • Newman–Lampert staining • Results expressed as cells/mL • Mean of two independent readings used Bacteriology • Culture according to National Mastitis Council guidelines • Selective and differential media • Incubation at 36 ±1 °C for 24–48 h • Identification by MALDI-TOF MS • Species-level identification accepted at log score ≥2.0 Total Bacterial Count (TBC) • Plating of 100 μL milk on Milk Plate Count Agar • Manual colony counting • Expressed as CFU/mL ⸻ Statistical Notes Due to non-normal distributions: • SCC and TBC were log10-transformed prior to regression modelling. • Mixed-effects linear regression models were used. • Animal ID was included as a random effect to account for clustering of four ducts within each jenny. Statistical analysis was performed using: • STATA v13 • GraphPad Prism v10 ⸻ Ethical Statement All procedures were conducted in accordance with national animal welfare regulations. Milk sampling was part of routine farm management practices and did not involve invasive procedures beyond standard milking. ⸻ Data Anonymisation All animal and farm identifiers have been anonymised. No personally identifiable information is included in this dataset. ⸻ Citation If you use this dataset, please cite: Attili A.R., Gallina E.T., Storoni C., Massacci F.; Bazzano M., Duranti A.; Li Y.; Cuteri V. Duct-level evaluation of mammary gland health, somatic cell count and bacterial flora in lactating jennies. Equine Veterinary Journal. (Under review)

Keywords

Donkey; Jenny; Mammary gland; Somatic cell count; Bacterial flora; Mastitis; Duct-level sampling.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average