
Slide from a panel session on the second day of the Copim Conference 2026, a hybrid event (26-27 February) focusing on the future of community-led open access books. Panel members: Lucy Barnes (chair) Julien McHardy Niki Rhyner Zoe Wake Hyde Abstract: One of the major drivers of the initial Copim project and the subsequent OBF project was the ambition to build open infrastructures to break down the barriers that inhibit the activities of OA presses, with a particular focus on the challenges faced by small scholar-led publishers. The aims of this activity were twofold: to enable existing presses to publish OA books more easily and to a higher standard (particularly with regard to technical aspects such as dissemination, archiving, accessibility etc), and to help facilitate the emergence of *new* scholar-led presses. While we have seen a significant rise in the numbers of new institutional OA presses, we haven’t seen the same growth in independent scholar-led OA book publishing activity. Now we are coming to the end of six years of infrastructure-building, this panel will discuss the reasons for the lack of new scholar-led presses emerging and potential approaches to encourage and facilitate this.
The Open Book Futures project is co-funded by Arcadia and Research England Development (RED) Fund (UKRI). Arcadia is a charitable foundation that works to protect nature, preserve cultural heritage and promote open access to knowledge. Since 2002 Arcadia has awarded more than $1 billion to organizations around the world. Research England Development (RED) Fund (UKRI) is a fund supporting institutional-level innovative projects in research and knowledge exchange including collaborations between education providers and between education providers and business.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
