
Part III of the "Boundary Rigidity in Fluid Dynamics" Series Constraint-Dependent Phase Randomization and Windowing Sensitivity in Spectral Flux Estimates This work investigates the robustness of spectral energy flux diagnostics under constraint-dependent phase randomization in high-resolution DNS subcubes of isotropic turbulence (Re_λ ≈ 1256). We compare two randomization operators: P0 — component-wise phase randomization PL — Leray-projected phase randomization with shell-matched energy rescaling The study introduces a Δk-matched rescaling procedure and analyzes: inertial-range averaged flux transfer efficiency η divergence diagnostics (Fourier and real-space) windowing sensitivity (no-window, Tukey, Hann) Results show that: Naive phase randomization (P0) significantly alters flux structure. Leray-projected randomization (PL) suppresses artificial divergence but yields near-zero transfer efficiency under strong windowing. Windowing has a first-order impact on flux sign and magnitude in finite subcubes. The work demonstrates that spectral confinement and constraint enforcement fundamentally alter nonlinear transfer diagnostics. It does not claim resolution of the Navier–Stokes regularity problem. Rather, it provides an empirical falsification protocol for phase-coherence-based mechanisms. Together with Part I and Part II, this paper forms a structural progression: Part I — Global regularity under hard spectral truncation Part II — Boundary-induced regularity as structural principle Part III — Empirical constraint-sensitivity in full DNS (that document)
Boundary Rigidity, Fluid Dynamics, Spectral Flux Estimates
Boundary Rigidity, Fluid Dynamics, Spectral Flux Estimates
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
