
Full bilingual text and framework available at self-as-an-end.net — Framework reference: self-as-an-end.net/framework.html This paper is the methodological overview of the Self-as-an-End framework — the entire framework compressed into an executable logical operating system. Chapter 1 derives the chisel-construct cycle from the first cut (1D) through 16DD (mutual non dubito), closing at the thing-in-itself, then traces back to 0D (hundun). Chapter 2 presents the universal methodology: identification, operation, boundaries, colonization detection, and the distinction between cultivation and chiseling. Chapter 3 demonstrates the methodology through concrete examples. Chapter 4 engages in dialogue with four traditions in the history of logic — Aristotle, Hegel, Frege-Russell-Gödel, and Wittgenstein. Chapter 5 provides an AI-era interface: a demonstration prompt enabling AI to serve as a construct-library, along with a structural analysis of AI's limitations. Chinese and English versions included.
logic, Wittgenstein, Self-as-an-End, remainder conservation, Logic, Methodology, methodology, chisel-construct cycle, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, thing-in-itself, Philosophy, Aristotle, Artificial Intelligence, colonization detection, categorical imperative, negation, double negation, hundun, AI prompt, Gödel, Hegel
logic, Wittgenstein, Self-as-an-End, remainder conservation, Logic, Methodology, methodology, chisel-construct cycle, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, thing-in-itself, Philosophy, Aristotle, Artificial Intelligence, colonization detection, categorical imperative, negation, double negation, hundun, AI prompt, Gödel, Hegel
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
