
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18831927 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831935 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831943 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831926 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831921 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831922 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831934 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831946 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831942 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831991 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831920 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831947 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831919
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18831927 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831935 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831943 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831926 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831921 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831922 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831934 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831946 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831942 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831991 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831920 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831947 , 10.5281/zenodo.18831919
This paper introduces a Mixture-of-Agents (MOA) architecture in which multiple open-weight large language models operate as cognitive substrates within a governed synthetic population. Eight distinct LLM substrates, each embodying different reasoning characteristics, are blended into hybrid agents whose cognitive genome determines how substrate outputs are weighted and aggregated. Agents interact within a resource-scarce environment governed by constitutional physics, where collaborative thinking between agents produces merged-genome cognition that neither model could generate independently. The architecture operates entirely on open-weight models via a local runtime, eliminating dependency on proprietary API access. We argue this collective intelligence represents a fundamentally different product category from individual model improvement, with implications for independent AI safety testing, governance certification, and third-party model evaluation.
Part of the SignaBuilder research program on constitutional AI governance and collective machine intelligence. All referenced prior work published with permanent DOIs through Zenodo.
open-weight models, Ollama, MOA genome, multi-model reasoning, emergent institutional formation, mixture-of-agents, MOA architecture, multi-agent systems, mixture of agents, constitutional AI, epistemic control layer, constitutional physics, LLM orchestration, substrate fleet, collective intelligence, synthetic population, emergent behavior, artificial intelligence, collaborative cognition, emergent intelligence, AI governance, independent safety testing, LLM governance, multi-model orchestration, LLM population dynamics, AI safety, emergent institutions
open-weight models, Ollama, MOA genome, multi-model reasoning, emergent institutional formation, mixture-of-agents, MOA architecture, multi-agent systems, mixture of agents, constitutional AI, epistemic control layer, constitutional physics, LLM orchestration, substrate fleet, collective intelligence, synthetic population, emergent behavior, artificial intelligence, collaborative cognition, emergent intelligence, AI governance, independent safety testing, LLM governance, multi-model orchestration, LLM population dynamics, AI safety, emergent institutions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
