Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Isotherm Modeling and Thermodynamic Investigation of Mercury Adsorption on Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes: A Comparative Study of SWCNTs and MWCNTs

Authors: Garg N and Jeet K;

Isotherm Modeling and Thermodynamic Investigation of Mercury Adsorption on Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes: A Comparative Study of SWCNTs and MWCNTs

Abstract

This study presents the surface modification of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to investigate their efficacy as adsorbents for the removal of mercury (Hg(II)) from aqueous solutions. Thiol groups were conjugated to the open ends of CNTs using a series of carboxylation, reduction, chlorination, and thiolation reactions. The functionalization of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) was validated by Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The capacity of surface modified CNTs to remove Hg (II) was investigated in relation to many factors, including adsorbent dose, contact duration, pH, and system temperature. Thiol-functionalized CNTs exhibited superior adsorption of Hg (II) ions relative to carboxylic-functionalized CNTs. The computed values of thermodynamic parameters, including enthalpy change (∆Ho) and entropy change (∆So), were found to be positive, indicating that the adsorption of mercury ions on the surface of CNTs is an endothermic process. The adsorption capacity of all adsorbents was examined using equilibrium isotherms, namely Langmuir and Freundlich, revealing that the highest adsorption capacity was recorded for thiol-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes, followed by thiol-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!