Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Thesis Framework The Five Gradations of Fascism and Their Historical Manifestations — A Study on the Extinction of Protest Mechanisms and the Evolution of Power into Absolute Violence

Authors: Salucco, Andrea David; Gemini (Google), Z-Prime;

Thesis Framework The Five Gradations of Fascism and Their Historical Manifestations — A Study on the Extinction of Protest Mechanisms and the Evolution of Power into Absolute Violence

Abstract

AbstractThis study defines five levels of Fascism and argues that the difference between "Just Power" and "Fascism" lies in protecting "Protestor’s Safety." The paper analyzes historical examples, such as the Khmer Rouge, East Germany, the Cultural Revolution, the Stalinist USSR, and Nazi Germany. It shows how Fascism progresses from physical elimination (L1) to spiritual enslavement (L5), resulting in a closed system of social entropy.________________________________________Part I: Taxonomy of Fascism and Historical EvidenceLevel 1: Physical Fascism (L1: Corporal Violence)• Theoretical Definition: Creating extreme fear through physical elimination, making protest impossible.• Historical Evidence: The Khmer Rouge (Cambodia, 1975-1979).• Analysis: The regime executed intellectuals and urban dwellers. The goal was to remove potential dissent.Level 2: Spatial Fascism (L2: Restraint of Movement)• Theoretical Definition: Coercing individuals within a closed space by removing the "Right of Exit."• Historical Evidence: East Germany (GDR) and the Berlin Wall.• Analysis: The Berlin Wall created a prison. When individuals cannot use "migration" to avoid oppression, resistance becomes extremely difficult, turning power into absolute violence.Level 3: Cultural Fascism (L3: Cultural Oppression)• Theoretical Definition: Erasing individual uniqueness in the name of collectivism, using social pressure to stop dissent.• Historical Evidence: The Cultural Revolution (China, 1966-1976).• Analysis: The destruction of traditional values and "struggle sessions" created high degrees of conformity. Protesters faced the state and a collective, weakening social defenses.Level 4: Cognitive Fascism (L4: Monopoly of Knowledge)• Theoretical Definition: Controlling information and historical interpretation, preventing logical judgment and defining justice.• Historical Evidence: The Stalinist USSR (Soviet Union).• Analysis: Rewriting encyclopedias and removing figures from photos cut citizens off from the truth. Without a factual basis, "protest" is eliminated at the cognitive level.Level 5: Spiritual Fascism (L5: Enslavement of Faith)• Theoretical Definition: Seizing the soul’s right to judge, requiring worship of secular leaders.• Historical Evidence: Nazi Germany (The Third Reich).• Analysis: The "Will of the Führer" replaced religious law. When victims "love" the oppressor, the spirit's self-correcting mechanism is removed.________________________________________Part II: The Civilizational Watershed: Power vs. FascismThis study proposes the Protest Safety Index (PSI).• Just Power: Uses limited force but ensures the protestor's safety. It sees protest as a needed signal for the system.• Fascism: Sees protest as a "virus." When a protestor faces total elimination—physical, spatial, social, cognitive, or spiritual—that force is Fascist.________________________________________Part III: ConclusionHistorical evidence shows that the five levels of Fascism are connected and reinforce each other. A civilization's strength lies in its ability to defend against these five levels.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!