We present the Theory of Aspectuality, a minimal structural framework intended to investigate the emergence, simultaneous structural admissibility, and stability of physical regimes through computational simulation. Rather than postulating fundamental laws, forces, or constants, the framework constrains the conditions under which regimes may arise and persist, treating physical laws as emergent invariants rather than primitives. Within this approach, familiar physical notions (such as space, time, mass, fields, particles, and quantum phenomena) are not assumed a priori, but are examined as possible aspects of regimes that remain structurally consistent under perturbation. The framework is designed to confront whether multiple such properties can coexist within a single regime without fine tuning or independent foundations. A key motivation of this work is the structural reinterpretation of gravitation, approached not as a force or interaction, but as a global constraint associated with regime closure. This interpretation is investigated within the same minimal framework, without presupposing specific dynamics, metrics, or physical substrates. The Theory of Aspectuality is not proposed as a replacement for existing physical theories, nor does it introduce new experimental predictions at this stage. Its aim is to define a testable structural arena in which questions of emergence, coexistence, and collapse admit non-trivial outcomes. The framework is intentionally simple: if inadequate, structural inconsistencies or counterexamples should arise rapidly through simulation. We therefore present this work as an open invitation to collaborative testing, falsification, and refinement.