
Abstract Language in public spaces serves not only as a means of communication but also as a visible marker of social, political, and economic power. This study explores how linguistic landscapes the collection of written and visual language in public domains such as signage, advertisements, notices, and official communications reflect and shape power relations within society. By employing a comparative approach, this research examines public spaces across different urban and sociocultural contexts to investigate the presence, prominence, and hierarchy of languages. Particular attention is given to the dominance of certain languages over others and the visibility or marginalization of minority or less powerful languages. The study applies sociolinguistic and semiotic frameworks to analyze how language functions as a tool for asserting authority, negotiating identity, and constructing social inclusion or exclusion. Data collection involves systematic documentation of public signs and textual displays, followed by qualitative and quantitative analysis to reveal patterns of language use and power representation. Preliminary findings suggest that linguistic visibility often aligns with social and institutional power structures, highlighting the intersection of language, identity, and authority in shaping public perception. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the dynamics between language and power, offering insights for policymakers, urban planners, educators, and scholars in sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, and cultural studies. Ultimately, the study underscores the importance of recognizing linguistic landscapes as sites where power, identity, and social relations are constantly negotiated and reproduced.
Linguistic landscape, power representation, public spaces, multilingualism, sociolinguistics, language hierarchy, comparative study
Linguistic landscape, power representation, public spaces, multilingualism, sociolinguistics, language hierarchy, comparative study
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
