Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Differential Noise Breakdown of Global Coherence and Correlation in Multi-Qubit GHZ States via Folding-Based Zero-Noise Extrapolation

Authors: pulcini, remo;

Differential Noise Breakdown of Global Coherence and Correlation in Multi-Qubit GHZ States via Folding-Based Zero-Noise Extrapolation

Abstract

AuthorsRemo Pulcini (corresponding) — Independent Research / Quantum Horizon (Italy)Technical support: AI assistant (methodology & code implementation guidance) AbstractWe study the differential robustness of global correlation and global coherence in GHZ states under depolarizing noise using folding-based zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), bootstrap uncertainty quantification, and model selection via Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Two global observables are compared: ⟨Z⊗n⟩ (correlation) and ⟨X⊗n⟩ (coherence). We introduce a practical metric, the Quantum Fragility Index (QFI), defined as the ratio between the noise breakdown thresholds of coherence and correlation. Numerical simulations (Qiskit Aer) up to n=4 qubits show that global coherence degrades earlier than correlation, with a clear separation in breakdown thresholds. We provide a breakdown map across noise strengths and folding depths, highlighting stability regions where ZNE remains well-behaved and regimes where it becomes unreliable. 1. IntroductionNear-term (NISQ) quantum devices are limited by noise. Error mitigation techniques such as ZNE can partially recover noise-free estimates without full error correction. However, different physical features may degrade at different rates: phase-sensitive coherence may vanish earlier than correlation signatures that can persist as classical mixtures. Motivated by this, we compare global correlation and global coherence observables for GHZ states and propose a compact ratio metric that captures relative fragility. 2. Background2.1 GHZ states ∣GHZn⟩=∣0⟩⊗n+∣1⟩⊗n2|GHZ_n\rangle=\frac{|0\rangle^{\otimes n}+|1\rangle^{\otimes n}}{\sqrt{2}}∣GHZn⟩=2∣0⟩⊗n+∣1⟩⊗n 2.2 ObservablesWe measure: correlation: OZ=Z⊗nO_Z = Z^{\otimes n}OZ=Z⊗n coherence: OX=X⊗nO_X = X^{\otimes n}OX=X⊗nOperationally, OZO_ZOZ is estimated by measuring in the computational basis; OXO_XOX is estimated by applying Hadamards on all qubits and measuring in Z. 2.3 Noise amplification by foldingWe amplify effective noise by increasing circuit depth using folding factors λ∈{1,3,5,… }\lambda \in \{1,3,5,\dots\}λ∈{1,3,5,…}, exploiting self-inverses (H and CX) in the GHZ construction. 2.4 Zero-Noise ExtrapolationFor each noise strength p, we compute expectation values at multiple λ\lambdaλ and fit polynomials E(λ)E(\lambda)E(λ) to extrapolate E(0)E(0)E(0). We compare linear and quadratic models; model choice is guided by AIC. Uncertainty is estimated via bootstrap resampling, yielding confidence intervals (CI95). 3. Methods3.1 Simulation frameworkExperiments were conducted using Qiskit Aer with depolarizing noise applied to single-qubit H and two-qubit CX gates (with CX noise scaled higher than H). Shots and bootstrap counts were chosen to balance stability and runtime. 3.2 Breakdown definitionFor an observable OOO, define a breakdown threshold pbreak(O)p_{break}(O)pbreak(O) as the smallest noise strength p where instability arises, e.g.: CI95 includes unphysical regions or becomes excessively wide (wide CI) extrapolated value becomes out-of-range or CI95 includes 0 while the low-noise regime remains clearly non-zero (practical collapse) 3.3 Quantum Fragility Index (QFI) QFI(n)=pbreak(OX)pbreak(OZ)QFI(n)=\frac{p_{break}(O_X)}{p_{break}(O_Z)}QFI(n)=pbreak(OZ)pbreak(OX) Interpretation: QFI 0 at higher noise, both approach ~0, but coherence collapses earlierAIC frequently favored the linear model in large portions of the parameter grid; some regimes showed improved fit for quadratic models, consistent with non-linear dependence on noise amplification. 4.4 QFI estimate (n=4)From the breakdown map, we observed approximate thresholds: pbreak(XXXX)≈0.28,pbreak(ZZZZ)≈0.34p_{break}(XXXX)\approx 0.28,\quad p_{break}(ZZZZ)\approx 0.34pbreak(XXXX)≈0.28,pbreak(ZZZZ)≈0.34 leading to: QFI(4)≈0.82QFI(4)\approx 0.82QFI(4)≈0.82 indicating that coherence breaks ~18% earlier than correlation in this setup. 5. DiscussionOur results highlight a practical and often overlooked point: a circuit may retain correlation signatures while losing the phase-coherent component that underlies quantum advantage. This has implications for benchmarking: reporting only correlation-type metrics may overestimate usable “quantumness”. The proposed QFI offers a compact diagnostic dimensionless ratio, and breakdown maps provide actionable guidance on when ZNE should be trusted. 6. Limitations & future workThis study uses a simplified depolarizing noise model; real devices exhibit coherent errors, crosstalk, and non-Markovian effects. Future work can apply the same pipeline to hardware backends or to more realistic noise models, and can test alternative mitigation schemes. 7. ConclusionWe introduce QFI and present a folding-based ZNE breakdown map for GHZ states up to 4 qubits. Global coherence measured by ⟨X⊗n⟩ degrades earlier than correlation ⟨Z⊗n⟩. The proposed metrics and mapping procedure can serve as a lightweight diagnostic tool for NISQ error mitigation studies. Data & code availabilityCSV files are generated automatically during execution (filenames printed at runtime). The benchmark script is self-contained and can be run on standard Python installations with Qiskit Aer. Data and Code Availability CSV files are generated automatically during execution (filenames printed at runtime). The benchmark script is self-contained and executable on standard Python installations with Qiskit Aer. Additional materials are available via: www.quantumhorizon.it

Keywords

Computers, Quantum physics, Quantum computers

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!