
Abstract Traditional Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDSs) based on pattern matching are inherently limited because they can only identify attacks that correspond to predefined signatures. To overcome this shortcoming, Machine Learning–based NIDS (ML-NIDS) have been introduced, with the goal of detecting anomalies by learning and analyzing protocol behavior. Nevertheless, ML-NIDS remain susceptible to previously unseen attacks, much like signature-based systems. This study examines how ML-NIDS learn and demonstrates that attacks operating outside the feature space represented in the training data can bypass detection. As a mitigation strategy, the study proposes early classification of active sessions before they deviate beyond the model’s learned detection boundaries as an effective means of prevention. Keywords: DecisionTreeclassifier, RandomForestclassifier, XGBoost classifier, AdaBoost classifier, ANN, CNN.
DecisionTreeclassifier, XGBoost classifier, Random Forest classifier, AdaBoost classifier, ANN, CNN
DecisionTreeclassifier, XGBoost classifier, Random Forest classifier, AdaBoost classifier, ANN, CNN
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
