
This Record is a living collection of validation notes and accompanying materials for the five-item Conflict Handling Measure (CHM) assessing situational conflict handling (avoiding, integrating, obliging, dominating, compromising). Each validation note is provided as a separate PDF with linked analysis outputs (tables) and a brief documentation. Included in Version 1: Validation Note 1 (Germany; N = 2,396): correlational evidence for convergent/discriminant validity. Citation: Cite the version-specific DOI for the exact evidence used. The concept DOI represents the continuously updated record across all versions.
validation, convergent validity, dual concern, conflict handling, assessment, construct validity, conflict handling measure, situational measure, German, dual-concern model, scale, Germany, single-item, CHM, discriminant validity
validation, convergent validity, dual concern, conflict handling, assessment, construct validity, conflict handling measure, situational measure, German, dual-concern model, scale, Germany, single-item, CHM, discriminant validity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
