Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

STRUCTURES AND PROCESSES: A Falsifiable Framework for Ontological Analysis

Authors: Salvador, Faruk Pedro;

STRUCTURES AND PROCESSES: A Falsifiable Framework for Ontological Analysis

Abstract

We present a falsifiable ontological framework: structures emerge from processes. A structure is any observable entity, system, or pattern; a process is any mechanism, activity, or interaction. The framework claims structures are not independent entities maintained by external forces—they are emergent patterns of organized process activity. This relationship is universal and necessary: every investigated structure reveals underlying processes; process cessation causes structural dissolution or transformation. The framework is falsifiable: find one structure existing without processes → refuted. No counterexamples found despite testing across physics, biology, cosmology, psychology, and sociology. We demonstrate a two-layer architecture: Layer 1 (ontological) makes claims about reality's fundamental structure; Layer 2 (epistemological) addresses knowledge constraints. A taxonomy classifies processes as mappable/non-mappable and visible/invisible, constrained by knowledge and tools. As capabilities advance, non-mappable processes become mappable—enabling self-correction without invalidating core principles. The framework emerges from pattern recognition: if processes cease, structures transform or vanish. This pattern holds universally across centuries of scientific investigation.

Keywords

ontology, processes, structures, emergence, falsifiability, pattern recognition

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!