
Ushbu maqolada tijorat banklarining raqamli transformatsiya jarayoni, an’anaviy banking tizimidanneobanklarga o‘tishning iqtisodiy va texnologik jihatlari tadqiq etiladi. Tadqiqotda O‘zbekiston, Rossiya Federatsiyasi,Qozog‘iston va Yevropa Ittifoqi mamlakatlarining neobank rivojlanish tajribasi qiyosiy tahlil usulida o‘rganiladi. IMRADmetodologiyasi asosida tuzilgan ushbu maqola raqamli transformatsiyaning asosiy haydovchi kuchlarini, an’anaviybanklarning tarkibiy cheklovlarini, neobanklarning raqobat afzalliklarini va O‘zbekiston sharoitida yuzaga keladigan o‘zigaxos muammolarni aniqlaydi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, O‘zbekiston tijorat banklari 2019–2024-yillar oralig‘idaraqamli xizmatlar hajmini 340% ga oshirgan bo‘lsa-da, neobank formatiga to‘liq o‘tish uchun me’yoriy-huquqiy muhit,infratuzilma va kadrlar salohiyati sohasida yechilmagan muammolar saqlanib qolmoqda. Maqola tijorat banklariningraqamli transformatsiyasini jadallashtirishga qaratilgan siyosiy tavsiyalar bilan yakunlanadi
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
