Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Recycled Polypropylene, Virgin Polypropylene, and Virgin Cotton Tote Bags: Environmental, Economic, and Durability Analysis

Authors: Mane, Viraj;

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Recycled Polypropylene, Virgin Polypropylene, and Virgin Cotton Tote Bags: Environmental, Economic, and Durability Analysis

Abstract

This study presents a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of three reusable tote bag materials, recycled polypropylene (rPP), virgin polypropylene (vPP), and virgin cotton, using the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint and Endpoint (H) methods in OpenLCA with the Ecoinvent 3.9 database, in compliance with ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 standards. The functional unit is defined as carrying 5 kg of groceries over 100 shopping trips under a cradle-to-grave system boundary. Results show that rPP achieves the lowest environmental impact across nearly all 17 impact categories, with over 50% reduction in global warming potential and 65% reduction in fossil resource use compared to vPP. Cotton exhibits the highest impacts in water consumption, land use, and toxicity due to agrochemical-intensive cultivation. Sensitivity analysis identifies reuse frequency, recycled content, and energy mix as critical sustainability drivers. Overall, recycled polypropylene provides the best balance of environmental performance, cost-efficiency, and durability, supporting circular economy principles in sustainable packaging applications.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!