Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Presentation . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Constraining the birth and growth of early black holes with JWST observations

Authors: Bhatt, Maulik;

Constraining the birth and growth of early black holes with JWST observations

Abstract

Observations of massive black holes (MBHs) at high redshift (greater than five) challenge our theoretical understanding of black hole seed formation and early growth. We compare JWST observations of high-z MBHs with results from large-scale cosmological simulations (TNG300, EAGLE, SIMBA) in the redshift range between five and seven, finding that theoretical predictions under (over) estimate the observed masses (accretion rates) of MBHs. We thus present a semi-numeric model, based on the Uchuu large scale N-body simulations, that allows us to compute the growth of BHs starting from different seeding and accretion prescriptions. For what concerns seeding, we consider three possible scenarios (PopIII remnants, direct collapse BHs and primordial BHs) that differ in terms of seeding epochs and seed masses. For what concerns accretion, we parametrize the Eddington ratio distribution with a redshift-dependent log-normal, including both super-Eddington accretion and an accretion-dependent radiative efficiency. We determine the free parameters of the accretion model using an MCMC algorithm and exploiting the BH masses observed by JWST in the redshift range from five to eleven. Based on our results, we finally show how JWST observations, particularly at redshifts beyond eight, will play critical role in constraining the origin and growth of the earliest MBHs.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!