
What do we (think we) know about narrative CVs? Narrative CVs (NCVs), that is CVs which replace long lists and metrics with contextual narrative sections, have been adopted by many research funders across the world and by some universities for use in recruitment and promotions. Some of the reasons organisations use them in this way are to: streamline or harmonise formats of CVs across a funding scheme or schemes allow for the recognition of a broader range of contributions to research reduce barriers between disciplines and sectors improve diversity of individuals who are selected for funding and roles in academia improve research culture What do we know about whether NCVs are helping us to achieve these goals? Our project looks at what we know and don’t know about NCVs and their effects on research assessment and research culture. Read our recommendations below, which we’ve tailored for different audiences: organisations considering introducing a NCV organisations already using NCVs meta-researchers studying NCVs and research assessment
Narrative CV, Research assessment, Research culture
Narrative CV, Research assessment, Research culture
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
