Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Forest Management Practices in the Philippines: A Content Analysis of the National Greening Program

Authors: Balmores, Ruen A.;

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Forest Management Practices in the Philippines: A Content Analysis of the National Greening Program

Abstract

Through the utilization of best practices and management plans, the Philippines has long proved its dedication to sustainable forest management. But are the upland forests of the Philippines being appropriately managed? A study by the Commission on Audit (2019), the Philippines’ Forest cover was lost at a staggering rate of 60%.Because of this alarming decline, the government created various forest management plans to address forest loss and degradation. The National Greening Program (NGP) was an intervention that the government implemented in 2011 to reinforce its commitment to sustainable forest management. Despite the conception of the NGP, there were reports of unsuccessful implementation of its reforestation activities on ground level. To evaluate the success of the NGP, this paper aims to assess the effectiveness of the National Greening Program, focusing on the accomplishments of its reforestation activities. A qualitative content analysis of textual data from available open-access journal articles and publications between 2011 and 2023 was utilized. The instrumentation used the coding scheme of validated textual data from journal articles and publications during the last ten years, focusing on the National Greening Program’s accomplishments as a reforestation approach. The evaluation of NGP’s accomplishments is important to understand how well the NGP’s goals are being met within the program. It also identifies the best forest management practices that were employed to achieve reforestation goals. Furthermore, suggestions are made as to how NGP best practices can improve the program and attain sustainable forest management in general.

Keywords

Forestry Management Practices, Content Analysis, National Greening Program

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average