
The success of global financial centres increasingly hinges not only on favorable economic and geographic conditions but also on the strength, transparency, and adaptability of their governance frameworks. As many developing economies strive to establish themselves as competitive global financial hubs, this study provides empirical insights to guide strategic policymaking in such contexts. Utilizing Propensity Score Matching (PSM), the research investigates the relationship between national characteristics and Global Financial Centres Index (GFCI) ratings. The findings underscore the pivotal role of governance quality, with variables such as government effectiveness, political stability, and voice and accountability positively influencing GFCI performance. Additional contributors include foreign direct investment (FDI), population growth, air cargo capacity, and commercial bank density. In contrast, overly stringent regulatory quality and high levels of perceived corruption are negatively correlated with GFCI scores, highlighting the need for balanced regulatory efficiency. These measures are critical for many developing economies to enhance their competitiveness and resilience in the global financial system. Robustness checks through sensitivity analysis confirm the stability and validity of the findings, even in the presence of potential hidden biases.
Global Financial Centers, Propensity Score Matching, Governance Indicators, Urban Financial Policy
Global Financial Centers, Propensity Score Matching, Governance Indicators, Urban Financial Policy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
