Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

STRATEGIC HR GOVERNANCE RESPONSES TO WORKPLACE MENTAL HEALTH RISK EXPOSURE

Authors: Jerryson Ameworgbe Gidisu, Mbonigaba Celestin, S. Riyasdeen & Tetteh Nettey;

STRATEGIC HR GOVERNANCE RESPONSES TO WORKPLACE MENTAL HEALTH RISK EXPOSURE

Abstract

We examine how strategic HR governance responses shape workplace mental health outcomes and how organizational culture strength conditions these effects at the organizational level. Using the Workplace Mental Health Governance Dataset compiled from internationally standardized sources, we analyze a global sample of 43 medium and large organizations operating formal HR governance systems between 2019 and 2022. We estimate multivariate regression models with interaction terms to assess how mental health policy design, leadership support practices, and employee assistance systems jointly influence psychological wellbeing, absenteeism reduction, productivity stability, and employee retention under varying cultural conditions. The results show that leadership support practices exert the strongest direct effects across outcome dimensions, while policy design provides a necessary structural foundation and assistance systems contribute primarily to recovery and retention. Organizational culture strength significantly amplifies all governance effects by translating formal mechanisms into consistent behavioral outcomes. The contribution lies in advancing the HR MindRisk Governance Model, which specifies a conditional governance architecture explaining why similar HR interventions yield divergent mental health outcomes across organizations and contexts. The findings refine HR governance and occupational health theory and offer policy relevant guidance for aligning governance design, leadership capability, and culture to reduce mental health risk exposure globally.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!