Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

Judgment Preservation in Persistent AI Agents: A Unified Cognitive Substrate for Routing Reinforcement and Metacognitive Continuity

Authors: Million, William Kyle;

Judgment Preservation in Persistent AI Agents: A Unified Cognitive Substrate for Routing Reinforcement and Metacognitive Continuity

Abstract

Persistent AI agents lose judgment — reasoning texture, eliminated hypotheses, methodology, negative knowledge — when context is compacted. Unlike factual memory, judgment cannot be retrieved because it was never discretely stored. The agent experiencing compaction cannot perceive the loss (the introspection gap). We present the Unified Cognitive Substrate (UCS), fusing a toroidal routing engine with the Emergent Judgment protocol. Engine validation: an 11-experiment program identified an architectural disconnection (v1.1) and validated a separated context energy field (v1.2), achieving 1,563× improvement in context-sensitive routing differentiation. Retrieval index benchmark (v2.1): we added an inverted index over routing snapshots (RoutingSnapshotIndex) to pre-filter judgment-node retrieval. On structured, clustered operational data, the pre-filter isolates 33 relevant nodes out of 99 (33%), reducing the scoring set by 67% (min_signals=2). On random baseline data, the pre-filter scored 79/100 candidates (79%) with min_signals=1. Paper versioning: this record hosts the current paper PDF (ucs_paper_v3.pdf) and associated updates (including the retrieval benchmark subsection).

Keywords

memory, reinforcement learning, cognitive architecture, AI agents, judgment, metacognition, judgment preservation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!