Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

CANCER IS PREDOMINANT LY VIRAL

Authors: IMBIMBO, LUCIANO;

CANCER IS PREDOMINANT LY VIRAL

Abstract

This thesis represents a shift in approach from previous versions. It does not merely propose a hypothesis. It asserts a conclusion supported by evidence already published by the international scientific community. Cancer is predominantly viral. This is not an alternative theory. It is the logical and convergent reading of what medical, epidemiological and biological science has already demonstrated — in peer-reviewed studies, in international journals, signed by institutional researchers. The hypothesis is built on ten independent convergences: spousal concordance, occupational risk in surgeons, tumors in transplant recipients, indoor/outdoor gradient in six countries, migrations, leukodepletion, ancient Egypt, historical pandemics, COVID across 142 countries, India across 43 national tumor registries. The most devastating data point: the country ranking for cancer incidence and the country ranking for COVID incidence overlap perfectly. Same order. Two different diseases. One single variable: airborne transmission in enclosed spaces. All six Koch-Hill criteria are already satisfied with existing data. The author is not an institutional researcher. He did one thing only: asked the right questions. And used exclusively their own evidence.

Keywords

METAGENOMICA, PATOGENO, VIRUS ONCOGENI, EZIOLOGIA VIRALE, INFIAMMAZIONE CRONICA SILENTE, DARK MATTER VIRALE, CANCER, EPIDEMIOLOGIA

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!