This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Willoughby Jason’s Entropy, Coherence, Decoherence, & Gravity: A Unified Theory of Everything in light of the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Its central purpose is to examine the extent to which Jason’s attempt to unify entropy, coherence, decoherence, and gravity converges with, or departs from, the logical, ontological, and cosmological discipline established by TO. The study argues that Jason’s proposal is intellectually relevant because it addresses unresolved problems at the heart of contemporary physics, especially the emergence of gravity, the structuring of the cosmos, the relation between information and order, and the transition between coherent and decoherent regimes. At the same time, the article maintains that such a unification remains ontologically incomplete if it is formulated only within an already temporalized and phenomenically constituted universe. In contrast, the Theory of Objectivity is presented not as a replacement for modern physics or cosmology, but as the necessary logical, ontological, and scientific foundation for any model coherent with a possible universe, given the modal necessity of its Seven Absolute Truths, as independently evaluated in dialogue with Artificial Intelligences. The article emphasizes that TO is not merely a philosophical model: it advances a complete theorem, expressed through its own non-conventional mathematical language of graphs and logical relations, demonstrating the emergence of the universe from a logical and perfect sphere that existed eternally before time, space, and matter. Particular attention is given to the theorem of the Perfect Sphere, including its structure of 64 logical straight parts on the maximum circumference and 2048 logical parts on the total surface, understood not as arbitrary choices but as consequences of modal necessity. The article also incorporates the Expansive Inductor Effect and the Reductive Inductor Effect as interpretive tools for re-reading entropy, coherence, decoherence, and gravity under TO’s ontological framework. In addition, the study explores the hypothesis that neutrinos may be phenomenic manifestations of the plasmas described in TO’s cosmology, thereby opening an operational bridge between modal ontology and empirical inquiry. It further integrates recent TO developments on testability, phenomenic classification, operational bridges, and emergent gravity, while placing the discussion in dialogue with authors such as Heisenberg, Einstein, Bohm, Prigogine, Penrose, Hawking, Weinberg, and Kuhn, as well as indirect experimental and observational references such as Aspect’s Bell tests, Planck CMB anisotropies, and LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave observations. Overall, the article concludes that Jason’s proposal may be preserved as a promising physical formulation, but that it gains greater coherence, depth, and explanatory power when reinterpreted under the modal and ontological discipline of the Theory of Objectivity. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; entropy; coherence; decoherence; emergent gravity; ontology of physics; modal necessity; Perfect Sphere; inductor effects; neutrinos; cosmology; phenomenic structure; testability; logical foundations of the universe.