
This study sought to identify students' attitudes toward digital learning using the Teams application in education, in light of certain variables and their impact on both students' attitudes toward using the Teams and their motivation patterns, as well as the motivation patterns predicting their tendency toward using the Teams app. A descriptive correlational approach was used. The study was conducted on a sample of 500 male and female students from Ajloun University College. A scale for the use of the Teams in learning, prepared by the researchers, and an academic motivation scale were applied. The results showed that the means of students' attitudes toward digital transformation and the use of the Teams were high, and that students exhibited a positive attitude toward it. There were statistically significant differences attributed to the average in weak motivation among low-achieving students, and significant differences attributed to the average in intrinsic motivations in favor of high-achieving students. There were significant differences attributed to gender in the attitude toward using the Teams among males. There were significant differences attributed to specialization in intrinsic motivations in favor of the literary specialization. There were significant differences attributed to the interaction of gender and average in intrinsic motivations in favor of high-achieving males. It was found that only intrinsic motivations significantly predicted students' attitudes toward using the Teams app.
Attitudes, Digital Transformation, Teams Application, Academic Motivation
Attitudes, Digital Transformation, Teams Application, Academic Motivation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
