Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

POPULATION-BASED ULTRASOUND PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS FOR CYSTIC ECHINOCOCCOSIS IN ENDEMIC KAZAKHSTAN

Authors: Ismailova, Gulziya; Fasihi Harandi, Majid; Kaniev, Shokan; Shapiyeva, Zhanna; Baimakhanov, Bolatbek; Casulli, Adriano;

POPULATION-BASED ULTRASOUND PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS FOR CYSTIC ECHINOCOCCOSIS IN ENDEMIC KAZAKHSTAN

Abstract

Background: Cystic echinococcosis (CE), caused by Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato, remains a significant public health concern in endemic areas of Kazakhstan. Despite global control efforts, CE persists due to insufficient deworming of dogs, the absence of control programs, and low public awareness. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2023 and June 2024 in 51 remote villages across two endemic regions of Kazakhstan. Participants underwent abdominal ultrasound screening and completed a structured questionnaire to assess potential risk factors. Cyst staging was performed according to the WHO - Informal Working Group on Echinococcosis guidelines. Statistical analyses included both univariate and multivariate models to identify significant predictors of infection. Results: The prevalence of CE was 0.34%, with higher rates observed in young people (82.1%) than in adults (17.9%), particularly among those aged 9–14 years. Major potential risk factors included dog ownership (OR = 3.17, p = 0.012), failure to deworm dogs (OR = 11.12, p = 0.018), feeding raw offal to dogs (OR = 3.06, p = 0.012), and consumption of unwashed vegetables and fruits among women (OR = 5.25, p = 0.005). All identified CE cases were newly diagnosed. Of these, 92.85% were active cysts, predominantly found in young individuals, while inactive cysts accounted for 7.14%, distributed equally between adults and youths. Conclusions: These findings underscore the urgent need for regular deworming programs for dogs, public education on hygiene practices, and stricter management of livestock offal. Further research is needed to investigate transmission through water and environmental contamination

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average