
We present a sleep-wake architecture that injects facts directly into MLP weights using MEMIT during wake, then maintains them through sleep cycles of auditing, constrained refreshing, and pruning. On 8B and 70B models, we identify a sharp wake capacity threshold: the 8B model sustains 0.92 recall at 13 unconstrained edits, collapsing to 0.57 at 14 -- a tipping point caused by cascading edit interference. Sleep maintenance with null-space-constrained refreshes converges to 100% recall even from severe degradation: 30 facts at 40% recall recover fully within 4 sleep cycles. The 70B model converges 2x faster and absorbs a second injection wave with zero degradation, demonstrating that model scale provides more orthogonal weight dimensions for non-interfering edits. The ratio between wake capacity and sleep capacity defines optimal sleep frequency -- a 'drowsiness signal' analogous to biological sleep pressure. We characterize a failure mode: when pruning removes working edits faster than refresh can replace them, a death spiral drives recall from 97% to 46% over 10 cycles. Perplexity remains stable throughout convergence (+0.5% for 8B at 14 facts, 0% for 70B), confirming that constrained MEMIT maintenance is a near-free operation. This paper supersedes our prior work on LoRA-based consolidation, removing LoRA entirely: MEMIT is now the sole memory mechanism, and sleep performs maintenance rather than pathway transfer.
Part of the Sleeping LLM research series on sleep-wake memory consolidation for lifelong learning in language models.
perplexity stability, language models, null-space constraints, lifelong learning, knowledge editing, MEMIT, memory maintenance, sleep-wake cycle, continual learning
perplexity stability, language models, null-space constraints, lifelong learning, knowledge editing, MEMIT, memory maintenance, sleep-wake cycle, continual learning
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
