
LLMs reason exclusively in natural language—a convention rarely questioned. We argue this constitutes a fundamental bottleneck: natural language is an inefficient medium for structured thought. Mathematicians do not write 'the sum of all integers from one to n'—they write Σi. We show that .ava notation achieves 2.65x compression, and hypothesize that compressing the medium of thought could enable proportionally more reasoning steps within a fixed token budget. Also available in French: Le langage naturel est-il le bon médium pour la pensée machine ?
LLM reasoning, natural language bottleneck, token efficiency, cognitive compression, symbolic reasoning, compressed thought
LLM reasoning, natural language bottleneck, token efficiency, cognitive compression, symbolic reasoning, compressed thought
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
