Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Towards improved political discourse quality using AI agents

Authors: Skvorc, Tadej; Horvat, Marjan; Koražija, Jure; Robnik-Šikonja, Marko;

Towards improved political discourse quality using AI agents

Abstract

Recently, large language models (LLMs) have enabled an in-depth, large-scale analysis of many complex phenomena. One such domain is political discourse on social media, which can serve as an indicator of many issues in society. In this work, we analyze how fine-tuning LLMs and artificial intelligence (AI) agents on social media posts related to the discussion of specific political commemorations can be used to both aid in discourse analysis and shift the messages produced by LLMs into a desired direction, e.g., changing messages from uncivil to civil. We first present a theoretical framework for analyzing political discourse based on eight discourse-quality indicators, followed by two methodological contributions. First, we show that models finetuned on a small number of manually-labelled examples are better at detecting discourse quality indicators than larger, non-finetuned models. Second, we finetune models on examples that match specific discourse quality indicators and demonstrate how this process can shift the messages produced by those models to more closely align with the desired indicator, e.g., civility. The findings imply that LLM-based AI agents could be used to moderate public discourse and improve its quality.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!