
Modern intelligent systems do not fail randomly. They fail geometrically. Despite unprecedented performance gains, today's AI systems remain operationally opaque: we measure what they answer, but not how they behave under constraint. Existing evaluation methods focus on correctness, benchmarks and surface safety rules, leaving the internal mechanics of failure, compensation and termination largely uncharacterized. This paper introduces the Universal Intelligence Architecture™ (UIA), a model-agnostic forensic framework that makes AI behavior measurable, structural and predictable. UIA demonstrates that any agent processing information under constraint must traverse a fixed operational space composed of three phases (Analysis, Building and Closure) and nine irreducible computational primitives per phase. While all agents share this architecture, they do not traverse it equally. Each agent develops a single dominant operational trajectory, or Agent Manifold, that defines where it is fastest, how it compensates under stress and how it terminates under safety pressure. Crucially, this manifold can be empirically calculated.
Control theory, AI safety, Constraint-based processing, Agent manifolds, Large language model evaluation, Model-agnostic diagnostics, Phase-adaptive systems, Computational thermodynamics, Behavioral geometry
Control theory, AI safety, Constraint-based processing, Agent manifolds, Large language model evaluation, Model-agnostic diagnostics, Phase-adaptive systems, Computational thermodynamics, Behavioral geometry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
