
๐ฃ: ๐ช๐ต๐ผ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ? Healthcare leaders designing, implementing, or evaluating AI-enabled solutions who need a rigorous, systems-level approach that complements technical validation โ one that accounts for operational realities, governance, regulations, privacy, and stakeholder engagement. ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ถ๐? Using a real-world leadership context, this use case features Dr. Kathleen Pajer, Director of the Precision Child and Youth Mental Health (PCYMH) Collaboratory at the CHEO Research Institute. It documents how Dr. Pajer, Christina Honeywell (Co-Director), and their team worked with me, as the external evaluation specialist at Vitus Consulting, to apply the RECAPยฉ framework and make their program more legible for decision-making. ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฃยฉ (RISK, EVIDENCE, CONTEXT, ASSUMPTIONS, PEOPLE) is a structured analytic tool grounded in Results-Based Management. ๐ช๐ต๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐? Recent systematic reviews (in comments) on AI implementation in healthcare have identified comprehensive monitoring and evaluation (M&E) as a critical enabler of success. Yet evaluations beyond model metrics or patient satisfaction are rare. A systems perspective is needed โ one that makes the work visible to all stakeholders, and creates a shared understanding of what real-world implementation entails. As Dr. Pajer explains: ๐๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ธ ๐ง๐ช๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ค๐ช๐ด๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ข๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ต๐ฉ, ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ถ๐ญ๐ต๐ด ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฏ'๐ต ๐ง๐ญ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ข๐ถ๐ต๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ข๐ค๐ต๐ช๐ท๐ช๐ต๐ช๐ฆ๐ด; ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฑ๐ข๐ต๐ฉ๐ธ๐ข๐บ๐ด ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ต๐ธ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฎ ๐ด๐ฉ๐ช๐ง๐ต ๐ข๐ด ๐ฆ๐ท๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ, ๐ฑ๐ข๐ณ๐ต๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด, ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐น๐ต ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐จ๐ฆ. ๐๐ฆ ๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐๐๐๐๐ยฉ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฐ๐จ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต '๐ช๐ฏ-๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ต๐ธ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฏ' ๐ด๐ฑ๐ข๐ค๐ฆ. ๐๐ต ๐จ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ถ๐ด ๐ข ๐ด๐ต๐ณ๐ถ๐ค๐ต๐ถ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ธ๐ข๐บ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ด๐ถ๐ณ๐ง๐ข๐ค๐ฆ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ด๐ต ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ช๐ด๐ฌ๐ด, ๐ฆ๐ท๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ ๐จ๐ข๐ฑ๐ด, ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฆ๐น๐ต๐ถ๐ข๐ญ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ช๐ต๐ช๐ฆ๐ด, ๐ข๐ด๐ด๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ด, ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ฆ-๐ณ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ง๐ข๐ค๐ต๐ฐ๐ณ๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ข๐ค๐ต๐ช๐ท๐ช๐ต๐ช๐ฆ๐ด ๐ข๐ค๐ต๐ถ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ด๐ญ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ ๐ช๐ฏ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ถ๐ญ๐ต๐ด. ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฃยฉ ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ: ๐ฅ๐ถ๐๐ธ: e.g., Data privacy ๐๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ: e.g., Research article by [Author X] ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ ๐: e.g., Canadian & Indigenous data sovereignty ๐๐๐๐๐บ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: e.g., No major changes to AI regulation in Canada in the next 2 years ๐ฃ๐ฒ๐ผ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ: e.g., Children & youth; caregivers ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐? Both this leadership use case and the RECAPยฉ framework are open access with citation (in comments). We hope it helps you in your work. Feel free to contact us with questions.
PCYMH Collaboratory is supported by funding from Waverley House Foundation
theory of change, use case, Artificial intelligence, Design (project), Healthcare Disparities/ethics, Systems analysis, Program Evaluation/methods, Leadership, case study, Mental Health, Program Development, Precision Medicine, logic model, Program Evaluation
theory of change, use case, Artificial intelligence, Design (project), Healthcare Disparities/ethics, Systems analysis, Program Evaluation/methods, Leadership, case study, Mental Health, Program Development, Precision Medicine, logic model, Program Evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
