Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Monster after Recognition: Euripides' Medea as the "Other" of Man and Society

Authors: ÇINARLAR, Zehranur; YILDIZ ÇİÇEKÇİ, Nazan;

A Monster after Recognition: Euripides' Medea as the "Other" of Man and Society

Abstract

This article examines Euripides' Medea through the lens of "otherness," focusing on Medea's dual role as both the "Other" of man and the "Other" within society. Euripides, one of the three great tragedians of ancient Greece, is acknowledged for his complex and nuanced portrayal of human psychology and social issues. His works, including Medea, often challenge societal norms and question rigid cultural constructs, making him a dramatist ahead of his time. Medea reflects the condition of ancient women, embodying their struggles for identity and autonomy in a patriarchal world. Medea is positioned as an outsider not only because of her gender but also due to her status as a foreigner, foregrounding her intersectional marginalization. Medea’s narrative captures this marginalization, portraying a woman who resists societal norms and confronts the systemic inequalities imposed upon her. By addressing Medea’s identity as a foreigner and a woman, twice othered, the article explores how Medea’s alienation mirrors the broader historical struggle of women to establish their identity in the face of oppression by men and society. It also discusses how Medea, in a way, as an atypical representation of ancient womanhood, defies her "Othered" position through her words and actions, challenging the rigid structures of societal expectations. Accordingly, the article delineates Medea’s complex characterization and her resistance to being confined within the role of the Other by the dominant social order in the intersection of women’s and identity studies.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!