
Abstract This article provides a comparative analysis of the legal regulation of child support, examining international practices alongside the legislation of the Republic of Azerbaijan. The study explores the "Income Shares," "Percentage of Income," and "Melson" models widely utilized in the United States and other jurisdictions, detailing their operational mechanisms and relative advantages. By comparing the provisions of the Azerbaijani Family Code regarding the determination and collection of alimony with international standards, the research identifies key similarities and structural differences. Furthermore, the paper covers the legal establishment of paternity, the criteria for modifying support orders, and the administrative and criminal sanctions imposed for non-compliance. The findings emphasize the necessity of refining legal enforcement mechanisms to secure the socio-economic well-being of children within diverse family structures.
International Law/ethics, International economic law, Comparative Effectiveness Research/legislation & jurisprudence, Psychology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, International law, sanctions, Physiology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Anatomy, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Sanction, comparative jurisprudence, income shares model, Family Code, Public international law, Child support, International Law/education, Anatomy, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Physiology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Histology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Psychology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Comparative Effectiveness Research/legislation & jurisprudence, International Law, Private international law, International Law/history, Histology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence
International Law/ethics, International economic law, Comparative Effectiveness Research/legislation & jurisprudence, Psychology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, International law, sanctions, Physiology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Anatomy, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Sanction, comparative jurisprudence, income shares model, Family Code, Public international law, Child support, International Law/education, Anatomy, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Physiology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Histology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Psychology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence, Comparative Effectiveness Research/legislation & jurisprudence, International Law, Private international law, International Law/history, Histology, Comparative/legislation & jurisprudence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
