Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Voice And Text Based Chatbot

Authors: Zaibindah Rafeeq Pandit; Sabit Aslam; Rehana Jan; Irfan Rasool;

Voice And Text Based Chatbot

Abstract

Conversational agents, or more popularly called virtual assistants or chatbots, are now a unifying interface for modern digital ecosystems, enabling seamless human-computer interaction. Fueled by unprecedented accelerations in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and Natural Language Processing (NLP), these agents evolved from script-based rules to sentient agents with the capability to understand context, sentiment, and intent. Transformer-based models such as GPT and BERT have significantly improved fluency, coherence, and chatbot response flexibility so that conversations could be more human-like. The present paper follows the historical progression of conversational agents from the initial symbolic systems such as ELIZA to modern-day deep learning models. It covers significant architectural components like intent recognition, conversation management, and response generation with emphasis placed on the intersection of speech-to-text (STT) and text-to-speech (TTS) for voice interaction. The book also looks into popular frameworks and toolkits used to develop and deploy chatbots into real-world applications across healthcare, education, customer support, and mental health. Moreover, the paper highlights major challenges hindering the robustness of current systems, including data bias, hallucination, context limitations, and lack of emotional intelligence. Moral implications—particularly of fairness, privacy, and explainability—are argued against in terms of novel guidelines and mitigation strategies. A modular, LLM-assisted architecture is suggested to demonstrate practical implementation with inherent evaluation metrics. Finally, the paper outlines guidance for subsequent research and development, calling for emotionally smart, multi-lingual, and culturally sensitive conversational agents that are ethics-compliant and highly accessible and performing.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average