
This presentation documents the first NAIF Track 4 workshop, held on 15 October 2025, dedicated to improving academic metadata within Swiss institutional repositories. Track 4 focuses on enhancing national and global academic data by strengthening the quality, interoperability, and usability of key metadata categories, including authorship data, organisational affiliations, funding information, and open‑access/licensing data. The slides outline the workshop’s structure, comprising a morning exploration of the current state of metadata creation and management, followed by afternoon sessions focused on co‑designing practical actions and measures. Participants engaged in collaborative mapping exercises across eight analytical dimensions - definitions, data flows, identifiers, interoperability, dependencies, reuse, data models, and quality - before developing action proposals to address shared challenges. The workshop emphasised co‑creation, transparency, and tangible outputs, culminating in prioritised actions to be further refined in upcoming sessions.
Metadata, Open Access data, Metadata quality, Institutional repositories, Funding data, Organisational data, Authorship data, Interoperability, Track 4, Research information, Switzerland, NAIF
Metadata, Open Access data, Metadata quality, Institutional repositories, Funding data, Organisational data, Authorship data, Interoperability, Track 4, Research information, Switzerland, NAIF
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
