Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Welcome to NAIF Track 4, Workshop 1: Improving academic metadata for Swiss repositories and institutions

Authors: Willemin, Simon; Bouton, Pascale; Sicot, Julien; Rodrigues de Matos, Jorge; Gallis, Quentin;

Welcome to NAIF Track 4, Workshop 1: Improving academic metadata for Swiss repositories and institutions

Abstract

This presentation documents the first NAIF Track 4 workshop, held on 15 October 2025, dedicated to improving academic metadata within Swiss institutional repositories. Track 4 focuses on enhancing national and global academic data by strengthening the quality, interoperability, and usability of key metadata categories, including authorship data, organisational affiliations, funding information, and open‑access/licensing data. The slides outline the workshop’s structure, comprising a morning exploration of the current state of metadata creation and management, followed by afternoon sessions focused on co‑designing practical actions and measures. Participants engaged in collaborative mapping exercises across eight analytical dimensions - definitions, data flows, identifiers, interoperability, dependencies, reuse, data models, and quality - before developing action proposals to address shared challenges. The workshop emphasised co‑creation, transparency, and tangible outputs, culminating in prioritised actions to be further refined in upcoming sessions.

Keywords

Metadata, Open Access data, Metadata quality, Institutional repositories, Funding data, Organisational data, Authorship data, Interoperability, Track 4, Research information, Switzerland, NAIF

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average