Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Manifold: Eliminating False Positives in Multi-Agent LLM Systems Through Specification-Driven Orchestration

Authors: Rempel, Fabio-Eric;

Manifold: Eliminating False Positives in Multi-Agent LLM Systems Through Specification-Driven Orchestration

Abstract

Multi-agent LLM systems promise autonomous task execution but suffer from twocritical reliability failures: false positives (systems report success on tasks that failstrict validation) and retry inflation (traditional retry logic degrades performance whileincreasing costs). We demonstrate that standard validation approaches produce a 66%false positive rate on structured extraction tasks, with naive prompting achieving 100%reported success but only 34% true success under universal validation criteria. We presentManifold, a specification-driven orchestration architecture that treats specificationsas verifiable contracts between agents. Manifold combines the Specification Patternfrom object-oriented design with fingerprint-based loop detection to prevent infiniteretry cycles while ensuring output correctness. Across 600 controlled trials spanningfour domains (adversarial image generation, structured data extraction, and multi-stepsynthesis), Manifold achieved 94% true success rate versus 34% for naive prompting(p < 0.001, Cohen’s h = 1.40) with zero false positives compared to naive’s 66%false positive rate. On structured extraction tasks, Manifold produced 99.1% field-levelaccuracy while eliminating all false positives. Smart control (retry logic) degraded to58–98% success rates while inflating costs by 1.5–3.5× across all experiments. Ourresults demonstrate that specification-driven validation enables trustworthy autonomousoperation by providing verifiable correctness guarantees, with implications for productionLLM deployment at enterprise scale.

Keywords

LLM orchestration, autonomous AI systems, fingerprint-based, false positive elimination, multi-agent systems, specification-driven validation, loop detection, retry logic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green