
Nonverbal communication has increasingly been recognized as an essential component of meaning-making in contemporary discourse studies. While early linguistic theories primarily focused on verbal structures as the principal carriers of meaning, recent research demonstrates that communication is inherently multimodal. This conceptual paper examines nonverbal communication as a structured semiotic system that interacts with linguistic elements to construct pragmatic and cultural meaning. Drawing on foundational works in kinesics (Birdwhistell, 1970), proxemics (Hall, 1966), bodily communication (Argyle, 1988), gesture studies (McNeill, 1992), and discourse theory (Karasik, 2002), the article proposes an integrative perspective that conceptualizes nonverbal signs not as auxiliary features but as co-constitutive elements of discourse. The discussion highlights how spatial organization, body movement, vocal features, and cultural norms contribute to communicative effectiveness. The paper argues that nonverbal communication should be understood as a cognitive-pragmatic resource embedded within socio-cultural contexts rather than as a peripheral expressive tool.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
