
This article examines the key indicators used to assess education quality in Uzbekistan and provides an analytical review of the country’s performance in major international assessment programs, namely PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) and TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study). The study explores national evaluation frameworks, identifies structural strengths and weaknesses in learning outcomes, and compares Uzbekistan’s results with international benchmarks. Particular attention is given to curriculum alignment, teacher professional development, regional disparities, and competency-based education reforms.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
