
This working paper proposes a fundamental reorientation of Artificial Intelligence: from performance amplification to cultural stabilization. It argues that the central challenge of modern societies is not a lack of intelligence, but a recurring loss of integrative capacity—manifested in historical cycles of polarization, regression, and ethical fragmentation. Against this background, the paper introduces a three-stage conceptual development: the Friedensmal (a spatial memory structure embodied in stone), the Klanghain (a resonance-based experiential field), and dialogical AI as a dynamic stabilizer of cultural maturity. Drawing on dialogical philosophy, particularly Martin Buber’s relational framework, AI is explored not as a tool for control or optimization, but as a potential medium for sustaining dialogical capacity, complexity tolerance, and long-term coherence. The paper situates AI within a broader cultural and anthropological context and outlines the conditions under which dialogically oriented AI systems could contribute to maintaining ethical and civilizational continuity in times of accelerated technological change.
Dialogical Philosophy, Resonance Theory, Artificial Intelligence, Cultural Stabilization, Civilizational Memory, Alignment Paradigm, Martin Buber, AI Ethics, Human-AI Interaction, Cultural Regression
Dialogical Philosophy, Resonance Theory, Artificial Intelligence, Cultural Stabilization, Civilizational Memory, Alignment Paradigm, Martin Buber, AI Ethics, Human-AI Interaction, Cultural Regression
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
